MacIver, unrecognized by today’s symbolic interactionists, sought the implications of George H. The paper focuses on the temporality concerns of MacIver: 1) the question of distinct qualitative Times, 2) the question of various temporal modes of being in the sociocultural realm, 3) temporality in social action. MacIver developed sociological theorizing along the Weberian tradition. Robert Morrison MacIver – Franklin Giddings’ successor at the Columbia University was a leading opponent of positivism (George Lundberg), empiricism (William Ogburn) and antitheoretical praxism (Robert Lynd). Collective trauma in particular shows the symbolic, emotional and moral dimensions of memory as a cultural phenomenon, the temporality of which is not limited to the past in the present, but also encompasses the future. The analysis of trauma as a cultural phenomenon can be grounded in the outlined concept of cultural memory with such essential dimensions as: communication, reflexivity of the knowledge about the past, axionormativity, affectivity and, last but not least, orientation toward the future. Trauma as a cultural process is based on symbolization this process takes place between the event,which has been traumatogenic for a community, and the establishment of its representation. Of significance is the development of a new semantics of memory, which is symbolized by the concept of trauma. Memory consists in communicative acts transmitting reflexive knowledge about the past from the perspective of the future present. In the cultural perspective, memory is a temporal dimension of meaning. Aiming at a revalorization of the cultural dimension in sociocultural phenomena, it particularly highlights the concept of cultural memory. This article presents an outline of the problems of time, history and memory seen from a cultural perspective.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |